Friday, June 12, 2020
Democracy Dies in Darkness
The official slogan of The Washington Post is Democracy Dies in Darkness.
According to Wikipedia, it was adopted during February 2017 and added to the website and then the print version of the newspaper.
I confess that I had seen the slogan, but was not aware of its recent addition to the banner. For some reason this morning I decided to research when it was adopted by The Washington Post. I was shocked to learn that it was just over three years ago.
The Wikipedia article documents the addition of the slogan to the banner as follows:
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" was the first slogan to be officially adopted by the Post in its 140-year history.[2] According to the newspaper, the phrase was popularized by investigative journalist Bob Woodward.[3] Woodward used the phrase in a 2007 piece criticizing government secrecy,[4] and referenced the phrase during a 2015 presentation at a conference when he talked about The Last of the President's Men, his book about the Watergate scandal. Woodward said he did not coin the phrase himself, instead attributing the phrase to a judge ruling on a First Amendment case, believed to be from Circuit Judge Damon Keith. The paper's owner Jeff Bezos, who attended Woodward's 2015 presentation, also used the phrase in a May 2016 interview. The newspaper said it decided to adopt an official slogan in 2016, before Donald Trump won the Republican nomination for president of the United States. This started a process which involved a small group of newspaper employees meeting to develop ideas for slogans. The group eventually settled on "Democracy Dies in Darkness" after brainstorming over 500 options.[2]
The slogan goes nicely with All the News That's Fit to Print, which of course is the slogan of The New York Times. I could not find that slogan on the electronic version of the paper, but it remains on the printed version.
It is the job of the free and Constitutionally-protected press to discover and report the news and to cast light upon those things which we need to know and which others may want to conceal from our view. We can disagree about the slant of the reporting, whether liberal-leaning or conservative, but at the end of the day it is the reporting of the news and happenings in our government which lights the dark places to reveal topics which we need to understand and address.
The press helps the electorate to hold our elected and appointed leaders accountable.
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Finding Bias
![]() |
Looter |
![]() |
Protestors and Demonstrators |
I have been reading the words more closely lately and I have found a basic difference in characterization of the protests underway in the U.S. by the media.
One report of Mitt Romney's walk with the protestors this past weekend reports it as follows:
Over the weekend, Mitt Romney marched with Black Lives Matter to protest President Trump.
Romney made it clear he agreed with the rioters and looters that America is a racist country that needs to pay for its sins.
-- Patriot Pulse
Fox News reported it more evenly:
Lawmakers including Rep. Ilhan Omar and Sen. Mitt Romney joined the crowds demanding justice for George Floyd in major cities over the weekend -- as some demonstrators seemingly amped up their rhetoric with stronger calls to disband police departments.
CNN Reported the event:
Over the weekend, Romney marched alongside protesters in Washington, tweeting what he has said is an obvious and important phrase to repeat: "Black lives matter."
What I want to point out is the characterization of the people that Senator Romney was marching with in the differing reports. The first implied that they were "rioters and looters." Words that are designed to incite the readers to action. The second and third, use more neutral words: "demonstrators" and "protestors."
Read carefully to discern the bias. Some of what is being "reported" is really propaganda.
Black Lives Matter
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
Return to the Court
It was not pretty and the weather was not conducive, but yesterday marked my return to the racquetball court for the first time since mid-March, fully three months ago.
![]() |
Outdoors Racquetball Court Columbia, MD June 9, 2020 |
My game was understandably ragged. I had to get used to playing in a mask and I also added a hat to help keep the sun off my head. And then there were the shadows on the court--which you can see in the picture. I have to admit, it was a different experience tracking the ball from sun to shadow and back to sun. I felt the concrete walls made the ball play faster--which further highlighted how much work I need to do to get back into some semblance of racquetball shape.
But despite the weather and the raggedness of my game, it was a great return to the court and the next step in finding the new normal living with coronavirus! And we are going to play again next week--during the morning hours to avoid the heat!
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Propaganda vs News
I have been reading a lot of reporting of late. I am trying to read reporting from liberal, conservative, foreign, and moderate sources to gain perspective on the the issues.
In reading the different sources, I am discovering trends that help me identify factual reporting versus slanted reporting (propaganda) playing on emotions or designed to incite a portion of the population.
An example from recent reporting:
If there is a reference to another news organization as "the fake news . . . " or "a reporter from the fake news . . . " I am probably reading heavily slanted reporting or propaganda. I offer an example from the reporting about the CNN Reporter that was arrested in Minneapolis. One sentence that stuck with me: Fake news CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez was broadcasting from the riots in Minneapolis . . . You can find the story at this link. Why is this clearly slanted reporting? Because the story was not about the particular news outlet, it was about a First Amendment Right being abridged in the arrest of a reported doing his job.
Factual reporting is just that--facts without the inflammatory verbiage. When inciting language is contained in the articles, then there is likely a propaganda intent behind the reporting.
Labeling everyone protesting as a terrorist is another tactic that I noted. During the past few days when there has been little violence, it has become clear that the peaceful demonstrators are citizens exercising their right to protest issues to the government. Yes, there were examples of looting early on, but they were not necessarily terrorists, they were criminals. Adding the terrorist designation without supporting evidence is an example of propaganda reporting designed to inflame a segment of the population. Tear-gassing and shooting demonstrators exercising their first amendment protected rights and following the directions of law enforcement is wrong--unless of course you decide that they are terrorists.
Beware what you read--there are forces out there trying to shape what you believe.
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Monday, June 8, 2020
Monday Musings - June 8, 2020
1. Here it is, the second Monday of June 2020. The year of everything crazy. The year is almost half complete and we still do not have our feet beneath us.
2. Summertime weather arrived. Thankfully, the pool is open and ready to cool and refresh. I have been enjoying it almost daily.
![]() |
Looking out from Big Cork Vineyards Rohrersville, MD June 7, 2020 |

4. I found an instructive article for people having a difficult time understanding "Black Lives Matter." It is titled The Black Lives Matter Movement Explained. I highly recommend reading the article.
5. The nearly perfect weather of the past few days has significantly increased my outside fun. Although I did not enjoy my pool yesterday, because I was enjoying wine at a vineyard, it was a magnificent day to be outside and enjoy the clear sky dotted with puffy clouds.
6. While at Big Cork, I inquired about the status of the grapes and whether they had suffered loss with the late season frosts the the region experienced. I am happy to report that because of the near constant winds the vineyards locations near the tops of the rolling hills, they did not suffer loss. I took some pictures of the vies and can report that I saw healthy grape clusters hiding beneath the leaves. There will be a harvest later this year.
7. Today in History. James Earl Ray, an escaped American convict, is arrested in London, England, and charged with the assassination of African American civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr.
On April 4, 1968, in Memphis, King was fatally wounded by a sniper’s bullet while standing on the balcony outside his second-story room at the Motel Lorraine. That evening, a Remington .30-06 hunting rifle was found on the sidewalk beside a rooming house one block from the Lorraine Motel. During the next several weeks, the rifle, eyewitness reports, and fingerprints on the weapon all implicated a single suspect: escaped convict James Earl Ray. A two-bit criminal, Ray escaped a Missouri prison in April 1967 while serving a sentence for a holdup. In May 1968, a massive manhunt for Ray began. The FBI eventually determined that he had obtained a Canadian passport under a false identity, which at the time was relatively easy.
Headlines
Trump Orders Troops to Leave D.C. as Former Military Leaders Sound Warning - The New York Times
Tropical Storm Cristobal Makes Landfall in Louisiana - The New York Times
New York City Begins Reopening After 3 Months of Outbreak and Hardship - The New York Times
Protests Fuel Moves to Shift Funding From Police - The Wall Street Journal
Apologies, Protests and Rebellion: Inside the NFL’s 72-Hour Awakening - The Wall Street Journal
Countries around the world join in anti-police brutality demonstrations - OANN
Saying Trump 'drifted away' from Constitution, Colin Powell picks Biden - Reuters
Tens of thousands join Black Lives Matter protest in London - Reuters
Black Lives Matter
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Sunday, June 7, 2020
Is that Dog Broken?
![]() |
Finnegan being Carried Another "crippled" Dog Elkridge, MD June 3, 2020 |
We saw more dogs during the evening which were being carried and there the comment about a crippled dog was always made.
Apparently Finnegan, although he was not present at dinner, discovered that he, too, could feign an injury be carried. It happened the other day during our morning walk as the temperatures were approaching 90 degrees.
Finnegan stopped walking and sat down. He would not move. As we were a good distance from home and with the temperature rising, I shared the burden with Chris and carried him. Finnegan became the crippled dog!
As it turned out I was not walking the dog, the dog was walking me!
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Saturday, June 6, 2020
Flag Respect vs Real Issues
Respect for the flag is back in the news and is supplanting reporting about coronavirus (no, it has not gone away) and social injustice. Although the discussion which generated the respect for the flag conflict was social injustice, it seems that conveniently this underlying issue has been dropped.
I learned a new word this morning, vexillologist: a person who studies flags.
![]() |
Drew Brees |
The statements for documenting this discussion are contained in a CNN report which can be accessed at the link.
Brees' comments come after he initially said Wednesday he would "never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag." He later issued an apology for his comments saying his comments were "insensitive and completely missed the mark on the issues we are facing right now as a country."
President Donald Trump then got involved and said Brees should have never backtracked on his comments.
"He should not have taken back his original stance on honoring our magnificent American Flag," Trump tweeted. "OLD GLORY is to be revered, cherished, and flown high..."
Brees then took to Instagram, saying that "we can no longer use the flag to turn people away or distract them from the real issues that face our black communities."
"Through my ongoing conversations with friends, teammates, and leaders in the black community, I realize this is not an issue about the American flag. It has never been," Brees' post read. "We can no longer use the flag to turn people away or distract them from the real issues that face our black communities."
But, about the flag, here is the really interesting part. A noted vexillologist wrote an an article titled, What Does It Mean To Disrespect The U.S. Flag?. In that article he highlights a flag display in The Art Institute of Chicago and one of the comments about it, “Why are we so OK with homeless people being on the ground, but not flags?”
He goes on to write:
In fact, it was this art piece that partially led to a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1990 that established the U.S. Flag Code as just a guideline, not an enforceable law.
Now you cannot be punished for placing a flag on the ground, burning a flag, or wearing one as a bikini. And that is a good thing, not just for your first amendment rights, but because we break the flag code literally every day.
He goes on to write about the kneeling during the National Anthem: We all remember the controversy around Colin Kaepernick and other NFL players kneeling during the national anthem. This breaks the U.S. Flag Code Title 36, Subtitle I, Part A section 301, which states: “(C) all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart…” It’s a clear violation, but totally legal.
Yet during the same anthem, sometimes in the same stadium, often a giant flag is spread over the field and held parallel to the ground by a host of volunteers.
This act violates subsection 8. “Respect for flag” Part C which reads: “The flag should never be carried flat or horizontally, but always aloft and free.” A few minutes later when the teams run out, you’ll sometimes see the flag as part of their uniform. Another clear violation. Part J reads: “No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform.”
He goes on later to begin to conclude:So what offends me the most as a flag researcher is when people decide who is represented by the flag and who isn’t — when they use it as an identity weapon against a self-defined out-group. Kneeling for the anthem, letting the flag touch the ground, all of those things just break an unenforceable guideline. Changing the flag’s meaning to represent something other than unity, however, is a desecration of the flag’s intent, purpose and design.
Let's be clear, it is not about the flag. Making it about the flag diminishes and obscures the real issue. The real issue, which is contained in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, as prescribed in the Flag Code, is ensuring ". . . with liberty and justice for all."
Black Lives Matter
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Friday, June 5, 2020
Time to Cool and Unify
The 90 degree heat, experienced for the second day in a row, broke last night as thunderstorms rolled across the area. Much needed rain was received which revived the plants. Hopefully, the rain will cool the rhetoric in the nation a bit.
It was a tumultuous day with statements by a very respected General and former Secretary of Defense about the nation's situation being published. And then, there were corroborating statements from other retired generals. And tweets, of course there were tweets.
I read former Secretary of Defense James Mattis' statement. While some parts were highlighted in the news, I found two paragraphs especially meaningful towards the end of his statement, one of which was extensively quoted, but the paragraph preceding it provides an important and interesting historical context. I am using the statement as quoted in The Atlantic article, James Mattis Denounces President Trump, Describes Him as a Threat to the Constitution.
Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength.’” We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics.
Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.
Despite yesterday's tweets about General Mattis, the president made the following statement about the general at his swearing-in ceremony on January 27, 2017:
I'd like to first congratulate General James Mattis, now Secretary Mattis. Secretary Mattis has devoted his life to serving his country. He is a man of honor, a man of devotion, and a man of total action. He likes action. He is the right man at the right time, and he will do us all very, very proud.
I think the statement that I highlighted is more true than was realized at the time.
We need to heed the general's words and resist efforts to divide us. We must set aside political divisions and also overcome cultural and ethnic divisiveness. We are all different and unique, but we are all Americans and our diverse nature is what makes us strong unlike any other country on the planet. We embrace our diversity.
We American citizens are the "We the People" referred to in the preamble of the Constitution. "We the People" have the ultimate power to effect change and ensure the survival of the Republic described in the Constitution.
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Thursday, June 4, 2020
Finding a Normal Again
![]() |
Pool Party Elkridge, MD June 3, 2020 |
I loved it.
![]() |
Pool Party from Above Radio Flyer above Elkridge, MD June 3, 2020 |
It was such a nice day that I even took Radio Flyer up for a short 9 minute to a maximum altitude of 55 feet flight to capture the scene from above. At one point the boys threw balls at the drone--so I had to anticipate the throws and move away from the potential danger.
I believe that the pool will see a lot of activity this year from family and close friends due to the reduced opportunities to enjoy the water in their own neighborhoods.
We are all struggling to find the new normal as we learn to live with the coronavirus.
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Wednesday, June 3, 2020
A New Day Arrives
Yesterday was a momentous day.
![]() |
First Dinner Out since Coronavirus Lock-down Annapolis, MD June 2, 2020 |
It was primary day in Maryland and we voted by mail last week. Chris and I are very comfortable voting by mail. Having been in the military when I was younger, I never missed voting in a primary or a general election and I always had to vote by mail. I believe every vote matters and I personally do not see a problem with using mail-in ballots. It is important to vote and to have every vote counted.
We also went out to dinner for the first time since the coronavirus lockdown. Yes to a restaurant, ok it calls itself a pub, Davis' Pub. We met with friends who arrived, in Annapolis, for dinner. We met with them as protestors were gathering to march through the streets of Maryland's capitol city. It was exciting to see the protestors gathering and we found a restaurant away from the crowd to enjoy dinner and catch-up on life since the last time we enjoyed time together. Dinner outside was great and we were told that this was only the second day that the pub was open for dining outside since the coronavirus lock-down. During dinner we could hear helicopters circling over downtown Annapolis monitoring the demonstration.
![]() |
Top of the Maryland Statehouse From Main Street, Annapolis, MD June 2, 2020 |
![]() |
Chris on Main Street Annapolis, MD June 2, 2020 |
Yesterday a new day dawned complete with citizens peacefully exercising their Constitutional right to demand change and dinner at a restaurant for the first time since early-March!
I wonder what new things today will bring.
-- Bob Doan, Elkridge, MD
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)